Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Clandestine removal - IMT Bars - Area based exemption - Though the appellant subsequently paid duty but at time of clearance they have mis-declared and cleared the goods clandestinely. Therefore, the appellant has clearly contravened the condition stipulated under the Notification No. 39/2001- CE. Therefore the re credit of the duty paid subsequently is not admissible to the appellant. - The appellants plea that there is no suppression of fact in the present case is of no help to them - AT
Clandestine removal - IMT Bars - Area based exemption - Though the appellant subsequently paid duty but at time of clearance they have mis-declared and cleared the goods clandestinely. Therefore, the appellant has clearly contravened the condition stipulated under the Notification No. 39/2001- CE. Therefore the re credit of the duty paid subsequently is not admissible to the appellant. - The appellants plea that there is no suppression of fact in the present case is of no help to them - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.