Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - PCIT could not merely sit solely in the capacity of a revisional authority qua the new material but was required to perform the task of AO in tandem and discharge quasi-judicial function independently. - PCIT has failed to do so. Neither the purported evidence collected from SEBI were confronted nor the cross examination of adversarial statement was provided. The opportunity contemplated under S. 263 is thus rendered illusory and merely an empty formality resulting in miscarriage of justice in contravention of expresses intendment of law. - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - PCIT could not merely sit solely in the capacity of a revisional authority qua the new material but was required to perform the task of AO in tandem and discharge quasi-judicial function independently. - PCIT has failed to do so. Neither the purported evidence collected from SEBI were confronted nor the cross examination of adversarial statement was provided. The opportunity contemplated under S. 263 is thus rendered illusory and merely an empty formality resulting in miscarriage of justice in contravention of expresses intendment of law. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
