Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Dishonor of Cheque - misuse of disputed cheque - rebuttal of presumption or not - Section 138 of NI Act - In the facts of the present case, the respondent no. 2 has specifically averred in the complaint that the money was lent to applicant by her through her husband and relatives. When cheque was presented for the collection, the name of present applicant as payee was written on the cheque. The applicant being a drawer of the cheque, has not denied his signature - It is settled law that once the accused admitted a signature on the cheque in question, the presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act is to be drawn in favour of the complainant. - HC
Dishonor of Cheque - misuse of disputed cheque - rebuttal of presumption or not - Section 138 of NI Act - In the facts of the present case, the respondent no. 2 has specifically averred in the complaint that the money was lent to applicant by her through her husband and relatives. When cheque was presented for the collection, the name of present applicant as payee was written on the cheque. The applicant being a drawer of the cheque, has not denied his signature - It is settled law that once the accused admitted a signature on the cheque in question, the presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act is to be drawn in favour of the complainant. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
