Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Insolvency and BankruptcyOctober 27, 2021Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - It is clear that Respondent ‘Eastern Embroidery Collections Private Limited’ was the Corporate Guarantor of the Principal Borrower ‘Eastern Overseas’, and not a Personal Guarantor. Therefore, in terms of Sub-section (7) and (8) of Sec 3 of I&B Code, 2016 is a Corporate Debtor. Further, the applicable Rules would be ‘Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016’. - The Adjudicating Authority committed an error in holding that action should have been initiated against the Personal Guarantor of the Corporate Debtor under Section 95 of the Code instead of proceeding against the Corporate Debtor - AT
Initiation of CIRP - It is clear that Respondent ‘Eastern Embroidery Collections Private Limited’ was the Corporate Guarantor of the Principal Borrower ‘Eastern Overseas’, and not a Personal Guarantor. Therefore, in terms of Sub-section (7) and (8) of Sec 3 of I&B Code, 2016 is a Corporate Debtor. Further, the applicable Rules would be ‘Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016’. - The Adjudicating Authority committed an error in holding that action should have been initiated against the Personal Guarantor of the Corporate Debtor under Section 95 of the Code instead of proceeding against the Corporate Debtor - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
