Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - lack of inquiry v/s inadequate inquiry - apparently from the records and as per the observations of the Ld. PR. CIT, coupled with the failure of the assessee to establish with evidence that the AO had inquired and considered and, thereafter, adjudicated the issue, we are constrained to hold that this is a clear case of lack of inquiry by the AO. Even the assessment order is very cryptic in as much as it does not even mention as to what issues were before the AO. - Revision order sustained - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - lack of inquiry v/s inadequate inquiry - apparently from the records and as per the observations of the Ld. PR. CIT, coupled with the failure of the assessee to establish with evidence that the AO had inquired and considered and, thereafter, adjudicated the issue, we are constrained to hold that this is a clear case of lack of inquiry by the AO. Even the assessment order is very cryptic in as much as it does not even mention as to what issues were before the AO. - Revision order sustained - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
