Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Insolvency and BankruptcyOctober 16, 2021Case LawsHC
Supersession of Board of Directors of respondent No.2 - appointment of the administrator further mentioning that respondent No.1 intends to shortly initiate the process of resolution of respondent - inspection conducted by the RBI - inspection revealed serious deterioration in its financial position. - The present is not a fit case where for invocation of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. - HC
Supersession of Board of Directors of respondent No.2 - appointment of the administrator further mentioning that respondent No.1 intends to shortly initiate the process of resolution of respondent - inspection conducted by the RBI - inspection revealed serious deterioration in its financial position. - The present is not a fit case where for invocation of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
