Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Assessment passed u/s.153A - Presumption in case of seized documents - Assessee’s son was also covered under the search in the same premises and the document found from the said premises has been categorically owned by his son who has given his explanation, then instead of drawing any inference in his assessment u/s.153A, no presumption has been made in the case of the assessee. Thus, once this document does not belong to the assessee nor there is any mention of any name of the seized document, presumption u/s. 132(4A) and Section 292C cannot be made against the assessee. - AT
Assessment passed u/s.153A - Presumption in case of seized documents - Assessee’s son was also covered under the search in the same premises and the document found from the said premises has been categorically owned by his son who has given his explanation, then instead of drawing any inference in his assessment u/s.153A, no presumption has been made in the case of the assessee. Thus, once this document does not belong to the assessee nor there is any mention of any name of the seized document, presumption u/s. 132(4A) and Section 292C cannot be made against the assessee. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
