Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is definitely the violation of their incumbent duty. This penalty has rightly been imposed upon them. - there are no infirmity when penalty under section 112 (b)(i) has been imposed instead of it being imposed under CBLR. Similarly, penalty has been imposed upon under section 117 which is for such contravention as are not expressly mentioned under the Customs Act, 1962. - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is definitely the violation of their incumbent duty. This penalty has rightly been imposed upon them. - there are no infirmity when penalty under section 112 (b)(i) has been imposed instead of it being imposed under CBLR. Similarly, penalty has been imposed upon under section 117 which is for such contravention as are not expressly mentioned under the Customs Act, 1962. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
