Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
TDS Liability payment made by the LIC to its development officers? - Exempted Allowances u/s 10(14) - It appears that LIC devised a proforma for the development officer to fill up certifying the expenditure incurred by them for development of insurance business. A portion of the allowance thus granted was then treated as exempt under Section 10 (14) of the act. Way back on March 12th, 1997 the CBDT informed the Chairman LIC that such procedure was not in accordance with Section 10 (14) of the Act read with Rule 2 BB (i) of the IT Rules and that “unless an allowance is notified u/s 10 (14) (i) of the Act no portion of it can qualify for tax exemption.” - Liability confirmed - HC
TDS Liability payment made by the LIC to its development officers? - Exempted Allowances u/s 10(14) - It appears that LIC devised a proforma for the development officer to fill up certifying the expenditure incurred by them for development of insurance business. A portion of the allowance thus granted was then treated as exempt under Section 10 (14) of the act. Way back on March 12th, 1997 the CBDT informed the Chairman LIC that such procedure was not in accordance with Section 10 (14) of the Act read with Rule 2 BB (i) of the IT Rules and that “unless an allowance is notified u/s 10 (14) (i) of the Act no portion of it can qualify for tax exemption.” - Liability confirmed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
