Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Bogus purchases - information that was received by the A.O from the DGIT(Inv.) - now when the assessee had not only substantiated the authenticity of the purchases claimed to have been made from the aforementioned parties on the basis of supporting documentary evidence which had not been dislodged by the lower authorities, but had also got the confirmations from the respective parties alongwith their “affidavits”, therefore, there could have been no justification in the absence of any material proving to the contrary to doubt the genuineness of the purchases claimed by the assessee to have been made from the aforementioned parties. - Additions deleted - AT
Bogus purchases - information that was received by the A.O from the DGIT(Inv.) - now when the assessee had not only substantiated the authenticity of the purchases claimed to have been made from the aforementioned parties on the basis of supporting documentary evidence which had not been dislodged by the lower authorities, but had also got the confirmations from the respective parties alongwith their “affidavits”, therefore, there could have been no justification in the absence of any material proving to the contrary to doubt the genuineness of the purchases claimed by the assessee to have been made from the aforementioned parties. - Additions deleted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.