Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Revision u/s 263 - belated employee’s contribution to PF and ESIC funds - AO did not follow the CBDT circular but followed the HC decision - The CIT in exercise the powers vested u/s 263 of the Act cannot do something, what the Assessing Officer himself cannot do. Thus, the very premises on which revision was sought to be made by ld. PCIT had failed, and resultant order has no legs to stand. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - belated employee’s contribution to PF and ESIC funds - AO did not follow the CBDT circular but followed the HC decision - The CIT in exercise the powers vested u/s 263 of the Act cannot do something, what the Assessing Officer himself cannot do. Thus, the very premises on which revision was sought to be made by ld. PCIT had failed, and resultant order has no legs to stand. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
