Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Refund claim of pre-deposit - applicability of time limitation - the order dated 30.06.2014 of adjusting the paid amount towards the sanctioned demand was passed during the pendency of the assessee’s appeal challenging the said demand before CESTAT and the demand stands set aside by CESTAT. Such act of the Department cannot be denied to be the coercive manner and since the payment was made pursuant to the direction of Departmental Authorities the same cannot be considered as voluntary payment and has to be treated as payment under protest. - Section 11B proviso is clear enough to say that the limitation of one year shall not apply where any duty/interest on such duty has been paid under protest - AT
Refund claim of pre-deposit - applicability of time limitation - the order dated 30.06.2014 of adjusting the paid amount towards the sanctioned demand was passed during the pendency of the assessee’s appeal challenging the said demand before CESTAT and the demand stands set aside by CESTAT. Such act of the Department cannot be denied to be the coercive manner and since the payment was made pursuant to the direction of Departmental Authorities the same cannot be considered as voluntary payment and has to be treated as payment under protest. - Section 11B proviso is clear enough to say that the limitation of one year shall not apply where any duty/interest on such duty has been paid under protest - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
