Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Ad hoc disallowance of 10% of expenses - Since the AO or the Ld. CIT(A) has not rejected the books of account of the assessee they could not have estimated (ad hoc disallowance of 10%) the expenses claimed to have been incurred by the assessee. Moreover, the AO has made the ad hoc disallowance on the supposition that there might be personal expenditure - AO did not notice that the assessee is a company and not a Firm or proprietary concern etc. So, his reason for disallowance also fails - AT
Ad hoc disallowance of 10% of expenses - Since the AO or the Ld. CIT(A) has not rejected the books of account of the assessee they could not have estimated (ad hoc disallowance of 10%) the expenses claimed to have been incurred by the assessee. Moreover, the AO has made the ad hoc disallowance on the supposition that there might be personal expenditure - AO did not notice that the assessee is a company and not a Firm or proprietary concern etc. So, his reason for disallowance also fails - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
