Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Addition u/s. 56(2)(vii)(b) - difference in the value of shares transferred by the assessee company to its holding company, pursuant to a scheme approved by the Hon’ble Jurisdicational High Court - the appointed date is 01/04/2013 and hence, the value considered by the assessee, which is nearer to the date is appropriate. The valuation date taken by the AO is not in accordance with the appointed date approved by Hon’ble High Court and in this view of the matter appointed date taken and the valuation done by the AO is incorrect. - AT
Addition u/s. 56(2)(vii)(b) - difference in the value of shares transferred by the assessee company to its holding company, pursuant to a scheme approved by the Hon’ble Jurisdicational High Court - the appointed date is 01/04/2013 and hence, the value considered by the assessee, which is nearer to the date is appropriate. The valuation date taken by the AO is not in accordance with the appointed date approved by Hon’ble High Court and in this view of the matter appointed date taken and the valuation done by the AO is incorrect. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
