Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Compliance with the requirement of pre-deposit - Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - To Consider the amount deposited during investigation as pre-deposit - petitioner may obtain a certificate from the jurisdictional officer or Supt of Central Excise to the effect that the amount of ₹ 2.32 Crores paid by the petitioner has not been adjusted against any of the duty liability or refunded back to the petitioner - If such certificate is obtained, such certificate shall be produced before the Registry of the first respondent Tribunal - HC
Compliance with the requirement of pre-deposit - Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - To Consider the amount deposited during investigation as pre-deposit - petitioner may obtain a certificate from the jurisdictional officer or Supt of Central Excise to the effect that the amount of ₹ 2.32 Crores paid by the petitioner has not been adjusted against any of the duty liability or refunded back to the petitioner - If such certificate is obtained, such certificate shall be produced before the Registry of the first respondent Tribunal - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
