Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Siphoning of funds - collection of money from the public issue by publishing prospects in the year 1994 by the directors and promoters of the Company - petitioner was professional director - the petitioner being professional director is not involved into day today affairs of the company and there is no material on record to even suggest that the petitioner availed any benefit in capacity of professional director of the company. - considering the bare averments made in the complaint, the same deserves to be quashed and set aside qua the petitioner - HC
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
