Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Stay of demand - We are of the view that rejection of the stay-application is nothing but harassment to the assessee as there is no distinction between the facts of the pending appeals from the order of the Tribunal and CIT(Appeals) rendered in favour of the assessee for the earlier years and hence, CIT (Appeals) is bound to follow the order of the Tribunal for earlier years. - HC
Stay of demand - We are of the view that rejection of the stay-application is nothing but harassment to the assessee as there is no distinction between the facts of the pending appeals from the order of the Tribunal and CIT(Appeals) rendered in favour of the assessee for the earlier years and hence, CIT (Appeals) is bound to follow the order of the Tribunal for earlier years. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
