Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Validity of revision jurisdiction u/s. 263 - It is not in dispute that the borrowings and interest free advances to IHCL were made in earlier years and not during the year under consideration. In earlier orders we find that the borrowings made by the assessee and its utilisation thereof by way of interest free advance to IHCL has been accepted by the Revenue in scrutiny assessment proceedings, as meant for business purposes. - the reliance placed by the ld. PCIT on the provisions of Explanation-2 to Section 263 of the Act would not be relevant at all for the purpose of adjudication. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.