Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 27, 2021Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP by Operational Creditors - the Appellant has not fulfilled any of the conditions enumerated in Sub-Section 2 of Section 14 of the Limitation Act - thus it is not correct to accept the contention of the Appellant that the winding-up petition No.6 of 2015 was dismissed on the ground of mis-joinder of parties, and the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be allowed to appellant. - Relaxation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be allowed for unexplained period of about two years and ten months. - AT
Initiation of CIRP by Operational Creditors - the Appellant has not fulfilled any of the conditions enumerated in Sub-Section 2 of Section 14 of the Limitation Act - thus it is not correct to accept the contention of the Appellant that the winding-up petition No.6 of 2015 was dismissed on the ground of mis-joinder of parties, and the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be allowed to appellant. - Relaxation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be allowed for unexplained period of about two years and ten months. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
