Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Addition made u/s.56(2)(vii) - difference in value between the value adopted by the stamp duty authority on the date of registration of the flat (i.e in F.Y. 2013.14) and the actual consideration paid by the assessee - Mere registration at later date would not cover a transaction already executed in the earlier years - The pre-amended provisions will thus apply and therefore the Revenue is debarred to cover the transactions where inadequacy in purchase consideration is alleged. - AT
Addition made u/s.56(2)(vii) - difference in value between the value adopted by the stamp duty authority on the date of registration of the flat (i.e in F.Y. 2013.14) and the actual consideration paid by the assessee - Mere registration at later date would not cover a transaction already executed in the earlier years - The pre-amended provisions will thus apply and therefore the Revenue is debarred to cover the transactions where inadequacy in purchase consideration is alleged. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.