Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Rectification u/s 254 - Assessment proceedings u/s 158BC - jurisdiction questioned by the assessee with reference to Section 158BD - it is the Tribunal which has committed error in restricting itself to legal ground and in not addressing itself on certain other grounds of substantial nature without any fault attributable to the assessee. In such a situation, the cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred over the technical considerations pitted against it by way of limitation, to shun an apparent miscarriage of justice. - Remedy sought by the assessee can not be frustrated on the grounds of bar of limitation without weighing the circumstances of the case. - AT
Rectification u/s 254 - Assessment proceedings u/s 158BC - jurisdiction questioned by the assessee with reference to Section 158BD - it is the Tribunal which has committed error in restricting itself to legal ground and in not addressing itself on certain other grounds of substantial nature without any fault attributable to the assessee. In such a situation, the cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred over the technical considerations pitted against it by way of limitation, to shun an apparent miscarriage of justice. - Remedy sought by the assessee can not be frustrated on the grounds of bar of limitation without weighing the circumstances of the case. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
