Tribunal recalls order to ensure justice, allows rectification beyond time limits.

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's Miscellaneous Application, recalling its earlier order for adjudicating the undecided grounds, emphasizing the Tribunal's inherent power to ensure justice beyond statutory limitations. The Tribunal considered the peculiar circumstances, including its own omission to adjudicate substantive grounds, and referenced judicial precedents supporting rectification of its mistakes. The Tribunal highlighted that denial of rectification based on limitation would cause a miscarriage of justice, ultimately allowing the MA and setting a date for further adjudication.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the Tribunal's earlier order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act.
2. The impact of the High Court and Supreme Court judgments on the Tribunal's decision.
3. The Tribunal's power to rectify its own mistakes and the applicability of the limitation period.
4. The inherent powers of the Tribunal to provide justice beyond statutory limitations.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the Tribunal's Earlier Order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act:
The assessee filed a Miscellaneous Application (MA) under Section 254(2) on 19.07.2017, seeking recall of the Tribunal's earlier order dated 15.05.2009. The Tribunal had annulled the block assessment based on jurisdictional grounds under Section 158BD, leaving the merits of the additions un-adjudicated. The Tribunal stated, "Since, we have already annulled the assessment, therefore, the adjudication of other grounds taken by the assessee will be merely academic and accordingly do not proceed with other grounds."

2. Impact of the High Court and Supreme Court Judgments:
The Revenue challenged the Tribunal's decision, and the Gujarat High Court reversed the Tribunal's order on 27.02.2017, validating the jurisdiction of the revenue authorities. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by the assessee on 14.07.2017. Consequently, the Tribunal's annulment of the block assessment was overturned, and the legitimacy of the block assessment was restored.

3. Tribunal's Power to Rectify Its Own Mistakes and Applicability of the Limitation Period:
The assessee argued that the MA was filed within six months from the date of the High Court judgment, despite being beyond the four-year limitation period from the Tribunal's original order. The Tribunal considered whether it could condone the delay in such peculiar circumstances where the Tribunal itself had omitted to adjudicate on substantive grounds. The Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court's decision in S. Nagraj vs. State of Karnataka, emphasizing that "justice is a virtue which transcends all barriers" and that "the Tribunal should not allow the assessee to suffer for the mistake committed by the Tribunal."

4. Inherent Powers of the Tribunal to Provide Justice Beyond Statutory Limitations:
The Tribunal acknowledged its inherent power to rectify mistakes and emphasized that the "denial to rectify the own mistake of ITAT on the grounds of limitation would cause grave miscarriage of justice." The Tribunal cited various judicial precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in Honda Siel Power Products Ltd. vs. CIT, which stated that "no party appearing before the Tribunal should suffer on account of any mistake committed by the Tribunal." The Tribunal also noted that the "powers conferred by Section 254 of the Act on the Appellate Tribunal for disposal of appeals before it is of widest possible amplitude."

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the MA filed by the assessee could not be deemed time-barred due to the peculiar circumstances and inherent powers of the Tribunal to ensure justice. The Tribunal allowed the MA and recalled its earlier order for the limited purpose of adjudicating the grounds that remained undecided. The Tribunal emphasized that "an incomplete order wholly attributable to the Tribunal itself should not ordinarily cause miscarriage of justice."

Order Pronounced:
The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application of the assessee and recalled the order in IT(SS)A No. 18/Ahd/2000 for adjudication of the undecided grounds. The registry was directed to list the date of hearing on 17/12/2020, with no separate intimation required to the parties. The order was pronounced in open court on 02/12/2020.

---