Limitation period for rectification application under Income-tax Act starts upon receipt of Tribunal's order, not order date.

The court ruled that the period of limitation for filing a rectification application under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act starts from the date the petitioner-assessee receives the Tribunal's order, not from the date the order was passed. The court referred to legal precedents and held that the rectification application, submitted within four years from receipt of the order, was not time-barred. The Tribunal's dismissal based on limitation was overturned, and the matter was sent back for consideration on its merits, affirming the petitioner's statutory right to rectify within the prescribed period.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the period of limitation to submit a rectification application under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act starts from the date of the order passed by the Tribunal or from the date the petitioner-assessee receives the order.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Period of Limitation for Rectification Application:
The core issue addressed in this judgment is whether the period of limitation for submitting a rectification application under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act should commence from the date the Tribunal passes the order or from the date the petitioner-assessee receives the order.

Arguments by Petitioner-Assessee:
The petitioner-assessee argued that the rectification application was submitted within four years from the date of receipt of the Tribunal's order, not from the date the order was passed. The petitioner relied on several judicial precedents including:
- *D. Saibaba v. Bar Council of India* where the Supreme Court held that the limitation period for filing a review petition starts from the date of communication or knowledge of the order.
- *Petlad Bulakhidas Mills Co. Ltd. v. Raj Singh* where the Bombay High Court interpreted that the limitation period begins from the date the affected party has actual or constructive notice of the order.
- *Sree Ayyanar Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. v. CIT* which reinforced the concept that the date of receipt of the order should be considered for limitation purposes.

Arguments by Respondent-Revenue:
The respondent-Revenue did not dispute the legal principles established by the cited cases but argued that due to the petitioner's conduct of submitting the rectification application after three years and six months from the date of receipt of the order, the court should not exercise its discretion in favor of the petitioner.

Court's Analysis and Judgment:
The court considered the legal precedents and the arguments presented by both parties. It emphasized that:
- The period of limitation for filing a rectification application should start from the date the petitioner-assessee receives the order.
- The judgment referenced *D. Saibaba v. Bar Council of India* and *Petlad Bulakhidas Mills Co. Ltd. v. Raj Singh*, highlighting that the effective date for the commencement of the limitation period is when the affected party has knowledge of the order.
- The court also cited a Division Bench decision in *Vadilal Industries Ltd. v. Union of India* under the Central Excise Act, which held that the rectification application could be made within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the order.

The court concluded that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the rectification application on the grounds of limitation, as it was submitted within four years from the date of receipt of the order. The court quashed the Tribunal's order and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal to decide the rectification application on its merits.

Conclusion:
The judgment clarified that for the purpose of section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, the period of limitation for filing a rectification application begins from the date the petitioner-assessee receives the Tribunal's order. The Tribunal's dismissal of the rectification application on the ground of being time-barred was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a decision on merits. The court exercised its discretion under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in favor of the petitioner-assessee, ensuring that the statutory right to file a rectification application within the prescribed period is upheld.

---