Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Bogus purchase of machinery - Machine was purchased during the financial year 2008-09 and Inspector visited the premises of the vendors in December, 2014. The possibility of vendors shifting the place of business in between cannot be ruled out. Further, we observe that no finding of fact has been recorded by AO that these parties never had their place of work at the given addresses. - No infirmity in the order of CIT(A) in deleting the addition qua alleged bogus purchase of machinery and allowing assessee’s claim of depreciation on the same. - AT
Bogus purchase of machinery - Machine was purchased during the financial year 2008-09 and Inspector visited the premises of the vendors in December, 2014. The possibility of vendors shifting the place of business in between cannot be ruled out. Further, we observe that no finding of fact has been recorded by AO that these parties never had their place of work at the given addresses. - No infirmity in the order of CIT(A) in deleting the addition qua alleged bogus purchase of machinery and allowing assessee’s claim of depreciation on the same. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
