Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Claim of deduction u/s 48(i) - deduction of expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer of shares - whether the expenditure is incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with transfer of an asset is a question of fact, which depends in the facts and circumstances of the case. - Assessee was unable to point out that three share holders who were parties to the same transaction had claimed the similar expenditure in their returns as was claimed by the assessee - HC
Claim of deduction u/s 48(i) - deduction of expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer of shares - whether the expenditure is incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with transfer of an asset is a question of fact, which depends in the facts and circumstances of the case. - Assessee was unable to point out that three share holders who were parties to the same transaction had claimed the similar expenditure in their returns as was claimed by the assessee - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
