Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee did not comply with the notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act requiring the assessee to furnish certain information - Neither the AO nor the CIT(A) has brought on record anything against the evidences furnished by the assessee regarding his ill-health. We are of the considered view that this is not a fit case for imposition of penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee did not comply with the notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act requiring the assessee to furnish certain information - Neither the AO nor the CIT(A) has brought on record anything against the evidences furnished by the assessee regarding his ill-health. We are of the considered view that this is not a fit case for imposition of penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
