2020 (9) TMI 726 - AT - Income Tax

ITAT Pune: Appeals Allowed for Penalties under Income Tax Act Sections

Smt. Rupali Sanjay Bedmutha Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 3, Malegaon.

Smt. Rupali Sanjay Bedmutha Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 3, Malegaon. - TMI Issues:Penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act for non-compliance with notice u/s 142(1) and 271F for non-filing of return of income u/s 139(1).Penalty under section 271(1)(b) - Detailed Analysis:The appeals were related to penalties imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act for non-compliance with notices. The assessee, engaged in trading, did not respond to a notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act, leading to penalty proceedings. The Assessing Officer imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000, which was confirmed by the CIT(A). The assessee cited health issues, specifically acute depression, as the reason for non-compliance, supported by medical certificates. The Pune Tribunal had previously ruled in favor of the assessee in a similar case for A.Y. 2009-10. The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer overlooked genuine medical evidence and deleted the penalty. The Departmental Representative failed to provide evidence to differentiate the current case from the previous ruling. Consequently, the Tribunal found no justification to deviate from its previous decision and deleted the penalties for all related appeals under section 271(1)(b).Penalty under section 271F - Detailed Analysis:In another appeal, the penalty under section 271F was imposed for non-filing of the return of income u/s 139(1). The assessee, suffering from depression and under medical treatment, provided medical certificates and prescriptions to support her condition. The Tribunal emphasized that the Income Tax Act, being a welfare legislation, requires consideration of practical circumstances. The Department did not dispute the genuineness of the assessee's health issues. The Tribunal observed a lack of specific inquiry by the Revenue into the facts presented by the assessee. Considering the circumstances and the failure of the Revenue to challenge the facts, the Tribunal deemed it unfit to impose the penalty under section 271F. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the appeal under ITA No.1612/PUN/2017 was allowed.In conclusion, all the appeals of the assessee related to penalties under section 271(1)(b) and 271F were allowed by the ITAT Pune, emphasizing the importance of considering genuine health issues and practical circumstances while imposing penalties under the Income Tax Act.