Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - rebuttal of presumption - The defence taken by the accused that the loan transaction was with the father of the complainant but not with the complainant since has remained not proved, the Courts below have rightly held that the complainant has proved the alleged guilt against the accused which is punishable under S.138 of the N.I. Act. - HC
Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - rebuttal of presumption - The defence taken by the accused that the loan transaction was with the father of the complainant but not with the complainant since has remained not proved, the Courts below have rightly held that the complainant has proved the alleged guilt against the accused which is punishable under S.138 of the N.I. Act. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
