Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Disallowance of expenditure towards development of property - no supporting bills of expenditure were provided - CIT(A) has allowed on ad hoc basis only 40% of the expenditure so claimed was genuine and incurred for developing the property - No justification in the order of the ld. CIT(A) for sustaining disallowance of 40% against the 50% disallowance made by the A.O., therefore, the A.O. is directed to allow full expenditure so incurred by the assessee.
Disallowance of expenditure towards development of property - no supporting bills of expenditure were provided - CIT(A) has allowed on ad hoc basis only 40% of the expenditure so claimed was genuine and incurred for developing the property - No justification in the order of the ld. CIT(A) for sustaining disallowance of 40% against the 50% disallowance made by the A.O., therefore, the A.O. is directed to allow full expenditure so incurred by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
