Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Disallowance of expenditure towards development of property - no supporting bills of expenditure were provided - CIT(A) has allowed on ad hoc basis only 40% of the expenditure so claimed was genuine and incurred for developing the property - No justification in the order of the ld. CIT(A) for sustaining disallowance of 40% against the 50% disallowance made by the A.O., therefore, the A.O. is directed to allow full expenditure so incurred by the assessee.
Disallowance of expenditure towards development of property - no supporting bills of expenditure were provided - CIT(A) has allowed on ad hoc basis only 40% of the expenditure so claimed was genuine and incurred for developing the property - No justification in the order of the ld. CIT(A) for sustaining disallowance of 40% against the 50% disallowance made by the A.O., therefore, the A.O. is directed to allow full expenditure so incurred by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
