Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Imposition of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Who is the importer - No deponent has clearly mentioned that they were fully aware of the fact of the appellants being the owner of the goods and have merely mentioned that they were told so by the other concerned persons. There is virtually no evidence in the present case so as to show that the appellant were the actual importer of the goods - No penalty - AT
Imposition of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Who is the importer - No deponent has clearly mentioned that they were fully aware of the fact of the appellants being the owner of the goods and have merely mentioned that they were told so by the other concerned persons. There is virtually no evidence in the present case so as to show that the appellant were the actual importer of the goods - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
