Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CENVAT Credit availed by the Appellant for providing the output service of ‘renting of immovable property’ - there is no manner of doubt that CENVAT Credit availed by the appellant on inputs, inputs services and capital goods service used for construction of the Mall, which was ultimately let out could not have been denied to the appellant. - Further, even though the period in dispute may be from 1 April, 2011 to 31 March, 2012, but the ‘input services’ were received by the appellant prior to 1 April, 2011. - Credit allowed.
CENVAT Credit availed by the Appellant for providing the output service of ‘renting of immovable property’ - there is no manner of doubt that CENVAT Credit availed by the appellant on inputs, inputs services and capital goods service used for construction of the Mall, which was ultimately let out could not have been denied to the appellant. - Further, even though the period in dispute may be from 1 April, 2011 to 31 March, 2012, but the ‘input services’ were received by the appellant prior to 1 April, 2011. - Credit allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.