Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Special audit u/s 142(2A) - CIT has applied his mind and the anomalies and discrepancies that have been pointed out in the impugned order, to our mind are sufficient to meet the test of judicial review while questioning the subjective satisfaction for appointment of special auditor - the action of CIT cannot be held as mala fide or is an outcome of failure to pay the advance tax to the lacking of respondents’ authority.
Special audit u/s 142(2A) - CIT has applied his mind and the anomalies and discrepancies that have been pointed out in the impugned order, to our mind are sufficient to meet the test of judicial review while questioning the subjective satisfaction for appointment of special auditor - the action of CIT cannot be held as mala fide or is an outcome of failure to pay the advance tax to the lacking of respondents’ authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.