Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Insolvency and BankruptcyDecember 7, 2019Case LawsAT
Appeal against the initiation of CIRP - The ‘Corporate Debtor’ contends that on the date of filing of the petition, there was no default as contemplated in Section 7 - It appears that in compliance with the order of the Adjudicating Authority dated 29th November 2018 the ‘Corporate Debtor’ filed an Affidavit along with Bank certificate. But in reply no evidence was submitted to prove that the outstanding amount is due and payable. - Insolvency proceedings directed to be closed.
Appeal against the initiation of CIRP - The ‘Corporate Debtor’ contends that on the date of filing of the petition, there was no default as contemplated in Section 7 - It appears that in compliance with the order of the Adjudicating Authority dated 29th November 2018 the ‘Corporate Debtor’ filed an Affidavit along with Bank certificate. But in reply no evidence was submitted to prove that the outstanding amount is due and payable. - Insolvency proceedings directed to be closed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.