Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Inconsistent Rule with statutory provision - Section 18(6) of the JVAT Act, 2005 does not contemplate production of JVAT -404 Forms as a mandatory condition for availing benefit of ITC. However, Rule 35(2) stipulates further condition of production of JVAT 404 Form as requirement for claiming benefit of ITC. - To this extent, Rule 35(2) of the JVAT Rules, 2006 is inconsistent with the provision of Section 18(6) of the JVAT Act, 2005 and is required to be held directory in nature and not mandatory. - HC
Inconsistent Rule with statutory provision - Section 18(6) of the JVAT Act, 2005 does not contemplate production of JVAT -404 Forms as a mandatory condition for availing benefit of ITC. However, Rule 35(2) stipulates further condition of production of JVAT 404 Form as requirement for claiming benefit of ITC. - To this extent, Rule 35(2) of the JVAT Rules, 2006 is inconsistent with the provision of Section 18(6) of the JVAT Act, 2005 and is required to be held directory in nature and not mandatory. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
