Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Revision u/s 263 - AO was bound to follow the direction given by the Tribunal while passing order in u/s 143(3) r.w.s 254 and not permitted to deal with any other issue as it would have resulted in judicial indiscipline, accordingly, only tested the genuineness of the five sundry creditors, such order cannot be termed as erroneous - Pr. CIT exceeded the jurisdiction by invoking the powers u/s 263
Revision u/s 263 - AO was bound to follow the direction given by the Tribunal while passing order in u/s 143(3) r.w.s 254 and not permitted to deal with any other issue as it would have resulted in judicial indiscipline, accordingly, only tested the genuineness of the five sundry creditors, such order cannot be termed as erroneous - Pr. CIT exceeded the jurisdiction by invoking the powers u/s 263
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.