Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 40A(2) - expenditure is excessive or unreasonable having regard to the FMV of the goods, services or facilities - the assessee and Nimbus in negotiations with BCCI agreed neither to refund for the cancelled match nor to charge for the additional match - difference in fee did not prevent the parties from agreeing to fresh contract as to how to adjust the revenue proceeds - no addition
Addition u/s 40A(2) - expenditure is excessive or unreasonable having regard to the FMV of the goods, services or facilities - the assessee and Nimbus in negotiations with BCCI agreed neither to refund for the cancelled match nor to charge for the additional match - difference in fee did not prevent the parties from agreeing to fresh contract as to how to adjust the revenue proceeds - no addition
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
