<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Tax Act Section 40A(2) case: No additional tax liability due to agreed adjustments in sports board match revenue.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46978</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 40A(2) - expenditure is excessive or unreasonable having regard to the FMV of the goods, services or facilities - the assessee and Nimbus in negotiations with BCCI agreed neither to refund for the cancelled match nor to charge for the additional match - difference in fee did not prevent the parties from agreeing to fresh contract as to how to adjust the revenue proceeds - no addition</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 09:30:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 09:30:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Tax Act Section 40A(2) case: No additional tax liability due to agreed adjustments in sports board match revenue.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46978</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 40A(2) - expenditure is excessive or unreasonable having regard to the FMV of the goods, services or facilities - the assessee and Nimbus in negotiations with BCCI agreed neither to refund for the cancelled match nor to charge for the additional match - difference in fee did not prevent the parties from agreeing to fresh contract as to how to adjust the revenue proceeds - no addition</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 09:30:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>