Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Appeal u/s 35-G of the Central Excise Act - The order of the adjudicating authority is a reasoned and well considered order analysing the evidence adduced before him - concurrent findings of fact recorded by both the original adjudicating authority, and the CESTAT affirming the order of the adjudicating authority, do not suffer from any such infirmity - no substantial question of law arises
Appeal u/s 35-G of the Central Excise Act - The order of the adjudicating authority is a reasoned and well considered order analysing the evidence adduced before him - concurrent findings of fact recorded by both the original adjudicating authority, and the CESTAT affirming the order of the adjudicating authority, do not suffer from any such infirmity - no substantial question of law arises
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
