Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Revision u/s 263 - AO recorded in order that assessee had “duly furnished the details of opening stock, closing stock, sales and production i.e. consumption of paddy etc.” this was a case of ‘no inquiry’ - CIT has not undertaken any independent inquiry to contradict the conclusions reached by the AO and to demonstrate that the order of the AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue - revision not sustainable
Revision u/s 263 - AO recorded in order that assessee had “duly furnished the details of opening stock, closing stock, sales and production i.e. consumption of paddy etc.” this was a case of ‘no inquiry’ - CIT has not undertaken any independent inquiry to contradict the conclusions reached by the AO and to demonstrate that the order of the AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue - revision not sustainable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
