Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 97867 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of service tax claimed by the recipient of services (buyer of flat instead of builder) - Composite contract in relation to construction of complex - Claiming of the benefit of the judgment,[2016 (6) TMI 192 - DELHI HIGH COURT], cannot be denied to the appellant as the same was rendered “in rem” and not “in personem”. - AT
Refund of service tax claimed by the recipient of services (buyer of flat instead of builder) - Composite contract in relation to construction of complex - Claiming of the benefit of the judgment,[2016 (6) TMI 192 - DELHI HIGH COURT], cannot be denied to the appellant as the same was rendered “in rem” and not “in personem”. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
