<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Flat Buyer Claims Service Tax Refund; Judgment Applies Broadly, Not Limited to Specific Parties Under Delhi High Court Ruling.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39377</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax claimed by the recipient of services (buyer of flat instead of builder) - Composite contract in relation to construction of complex - Claiming of the benefit of the judgment,[2016 (6) TMI 192 - DELHI HIGH COURT], cannot be denied to the appellant as the same was rendered “in rem” and not “in personem”. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2018 08:08:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2018 08:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Flat Buyer Claims Service Tax Refund; Judgment Applies Broadly, Not Limited to Specific Parties Under Delhi High Court Ruling.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39377</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax claimed by the recipient of services (buyer of flat instead of builder) - Composite contract in relation to construction of complex - Claiming of the benefit of the judgment,[2016 (6) TMI 192 - DELHI HIGH COURT], cannot be denied to the appellant as the same was rendered “in rem” and not “in personem”. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2018 08:08:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>