Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
Refusal to stay the collection of demand - Asst. CIT directed the petitioner to deposit 15% of the disputed demand - Prl. CIT confirmed the order - it has failed to consider the issue whether the assessment orders suffers from being "unreasonably highpitched", or whether "any genuine hardship would be caused to the assessee" - Prl. CIT directed to review the order - Tri
Refusal to stay the collection of demand - Asst. CIT directed the petitioner to deposit 15% of the disputed demand - Prl. CIT confirmed the order - it has failed to consider the issue whether the assessment orders suffers from being "unreasonably highpitched", or whether "any genuine hardship would be caused to the assessee" - Prl. CIT directed to review the order - Tri
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
