<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Prl. CIT to Review Tax Demand Order After Failing to Assess Excessiveness and Hardship in Initial Evaluation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33838</link>
    <description>Refusal to stay the collection of demand - Asst. CIT directed the petitioner to deposit 15% of the disputed demand - Prl. CIT confirmed the order - it has failed to consider the issue whether the assessment orders suffers from being &quot;unreasonably highpitched&quot;, or whether &quot;any genuine hardship would be caused to the assessee&quot; - Prl. CIT directed to review the order - Tri</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:59:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:06:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Prl. CIT to Review Tax Demand Order After Failing to Assess Excessiveness and Hardship in Initial Evaluation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33838</link>
      <description>Refusal to stay the collection of demand - Asst. CIT directed the petitioner to deposit 15% of the disputed demand - Prl. CIT confirmed the order - it has failed to consider the issue whether the assessment orders suffers from being &quot;unreasonably highpitched&quot;, or whether &quot;any genuine hardship would be caused to the assessee&quot; - Prl. CIT directed to review the order - Tri</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:59:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>