Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Refusal to stay the collection of demand - Asst. CIT directed the petitioner to deposit 15% of the disputed demand - Prl. CIT confirmed the order - it has failed to consider the issue whether the assessment orders suffers from being "unreasonably highpitched", or whether "any genuine hardship would be caused to the assessee" - Prl. CIT directed to review the order - Tri
Refusal to stay the collection of demand - Asst. CIT directed the petitioner to deposit 15% of the disputed demand - Prl. CIT confirmed the order - it has failed to consider the issue whether the assessment orders suffers from being "unreasonably highpitched", or whether "any genuine hardship would be caused to the assessee" - Prl. CIT directed to review the order - Tri
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
