Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Imposition of penalties u/s 112 (a) and (b) of CA, 1962 - the noticees were not heard on the confiscability of the goods. In the absence of such an opportunity, there was no scope for rendering a finding on liability for confiscation - that also eliminated the jurisdiction to invoke section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 - AT
Imposition of penalties u/s 112 (a) and (b) of CA, 1962 - the noticees were not heard on the confiscability of the goods. In the absence of such an opportunity, there was no scope for rendering a finding on liability for confiscation - that also eliminated the jurisdiction to invoke section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
