<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs Act Section 112 Penalties Invalid: Noticees Denied Opportunity to Contest Goods Confiscation, Jurisdiction Lacking.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33679</link>
    <description>Imposition of penalties u/s 112 (a) and (b) of CA, 1962 - the noticees were not heard on the confiscability of the goods. In the absence of such an opportunity, there was no scope for rendering a finding on liability for confiscation - that also eliminated the jurisdiction to invoke section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:21:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:21:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs Act Section 112 Penalties Invalid: Noticees Denied Opportunity to Contest Goods Confiscation, Jurisdiction Lacking.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33679</link>
      <description>Imposition of penalties u/s 112 (a) and (b) of CA, 1962 - the noticees were not heard on the confiscability of the goods. In the absence of such an opportunity, there was no scope for rendering a finding on liability for confiscation - that also eliminated the jurisdiction to invoke section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:21:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>