Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Imposition of penalties u/s 112 (a) and (b) of CA, 1962 - the noticees were not heard on the confiscability of the goods. In the absence of such an opportunity, there was no scope for rendering a finding on liability for confiscation - that also eliminated the jurisdiction to invoke section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 - AT
Imposition of penalties u/s 112 (a) and (b) of CA, 1962 - the noticees were not heard on the confiscability of the goods. In the absence of such an opportunity, there was no scope for rendering a finding on liability for confiscation - that also eliminated the jurisdiction to invoke section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
