Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
There should be some evidence on the basis of which the action of the AO can be held to be justified to show that the expenses are unreasonable or excessive u/s 40A(2)(b). In the absence of any such evidence, an adhoc disallowance of 5% has rightly been rejected by the CIT(A) - AT
There should be some evidence on the basis of which the action of the AO can be held to be justified to show that the expenses are unreasonable or excessive u/s 40A(2)(b). In the absence of any such evidence, an adhoc disallowance of 5% has rightly been rejected by the CIT(A) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
