Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Application of sections 21 and 22 of the SEZ Act - Non obstante clause - Demand raised by the respondents from the present petitioners for payment of purchase tax under section 9(5) of the VAT Act is invalid and impermissible - HC
Application of sections 21 and 22 of the SEZ Act - Non obstante clause - Demand raised by the respondents from the present petitioners for payment of purchase tax under section 9(5) of the VAT Act is invalid and impermissible - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.